SEC Settles Insider Trading Case with former Yahoo Executive Robert Kwok

SEC v. Reema D, Shah and Robert W, Kwok, Case No. 12-cv-430 (S.D.N.Y.).  On June 12, 2013, the SEC announced it settled insider trading charges against former Yahoo executive Robert Kwok in a case filed last year. The SEC alleged that Kwok, a former Senior Director of Business Management at Yahoo! Inc., illegally tipped and traded based on inside information about Yahoo and Moldflow Corporation.  The SEC alleged that Reema Shah tipped Kwok about an upcoming acquisition of Moldflow by Autodesk, Inc.  According to the SEC, Kwok bought Moldflow stock based on the tip and sold it after the acquisition.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Revlon, Inc. for Misleading Shareholders When Going Private

In the Matter of Revlon, Inc., Admin. Proc. No. 3-15356.  On June 13, 2013, the SEC announced it filed settled administrative charges against Revlon for misleading shareholders in connection with a “going private transaction.”  A going private transaction is essentially one in which a company buys out the shareholders and deregisters the stock so that the company or a private equity firm can obtain all the outstanding shares. According to the SEC’s Order instituting settled administrative proceedings, controlling shareholder MacAndrews and Forbes (“M&F”) asked Revlon to offer minority shareholders the opportunity to exchange common stock for preferred stock.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Ernesto Lujan in Connection with Kickback Scheme

SEC v. Bethancourt et al., Case No. 13-cv-3074 (S.D.N.Y.).  On June 12, 2013, the SEC announced it filed an amended complaint adding Ernesto Lujan, former head of the Miami office of brokerage firm Direct Access Partners (“DAP”).  Last month, the SEC sued four people in connection with creating $66 million in revenue for fraudulent trades executed for Banco de Desarrollo Económico y Social de Venezuela (“BANDES”).  According to the SEC, Lujan played a significant part in the fraud, which included fake arrangements to hide kickback payments and routing money to a BANDES official through shell corporations.  Lujan’s alleged misconduct also involved tricking DAP’s clearing brokers, executing wash trades, and roundtrip trades to pad revenue.  The SEC seeks disgorgement, injunctive relief and civil monetary penalties.  The SEC also announced that Lujan was charged by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in a parallel criminal action.

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Brothers Leslie Jacobs II and Andrew Jacobs in Eighth Insider Trading Case Related to Sanofi-Aventis’ of Chattem

SEC v. Jacobs, Case No. 1:13-cv-1289 (N.D. Ohio).  On June 11, 2013, the SEC announced it filed insider trading charges against Andrew W. Jacobs (“A. Jacobs”) and Leslie J. Jacobs II (“L. Jacobs”).  The SEC alleges that when French pharmaceutical company Sanofi-Aventis (“Sanofi”) announced its intent to make a tender offer for Chattem, a distributor of over-the-counter pharmaceutical products, shares of Chattem closed 32.60% higher on the day of the announcement.  According to the SEC, A. Jacobs learned about the tender offer from his brother-in-law, who was an executive at Chattem.  Although A. Jacobs promised to keep the information confidential, the SEC alleges that he called his brother L. Jacobs and told him about the deal.  L. Jacobs bought Chattem stock and sold it for a profit after the deal was publicly announced.  The Jacobs brothers are both charged with violating Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules
10b-5 and 14e-3.  The SEC seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement, and civil monetary penalties.  The SEC also seeks an officer and director against A. Jacobs, who was an executive at a public company at the time of the tip.  This is the SEC’s eighth insider trading case related to the Chattem acquisition.

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges the CBOE for Regulatory Failures

In the Matter of Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated and C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated, Admin Proc. File No. 3-15353.  On June 11, 2013, the SEC announced it filed settled administrative proceedings against the Chicago Board Options Exchange (“CBOE”) and an affiliate for failures in their regulatory and compliance functions.  The CBOE is a self-regulatory organization (“SRO”) which is required to enforce the federal securities laws as well as its own rules to regulate trading on its exchange.  SROs must manage the conflict that exists between their regulatory obligations and their business interests and the interests of their members.  According to the SEC’s Order, the CBOE demonstrated was not able to effectively enforce Reg. SHO and had an ineffective surveillance program.  The CBOE also fell short in its regulatory and compliance responsibilities in several other areas during a four-year period.  According to the SEC’s order, the CBOE moved its surveillance and monitoring of Reg. SHO compliance from one department to another and the transfer of responsibilities negatively impacted the enforcement program. The CBOE failed to take action against any firm for Reg. SHO violations as a result of its own surveillance or complaints from third parties.  According to the Order, the CBOE lacked a fundamental understanding of Reg. SHO in that its investigators never received any formal training and the CBOE never ensured that investigators read the relevant rules.  In addition, the SEC’s order found that the CBOE assisted a same member firm when it became the subject of an SEC investigation.  The CBOE failed to provide information to SEC staff when requested, and even aided the member firm by providing information for its Wells submission to the SEC.  The CBOE also edited the firm’s draft Wells submission.

According to the Order, the CBOE had other regulatory and compliance issues including providing unauthorized “customer accommodation” payments to some members and not others without applicable rules in place, resulting in unfair discrimination. And the CBOE and affiliate C2 Options Exchange failed to file proposed rule changes with the SEC when certain trading functions on their exchanges were implemented.

The SEC’s Order finds that the CBOE violated Section 19(b)(1) and Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act as well as Section 17(a) and Rule 17a-1 when it failed to promptly provide information requested by the SEC that the exchange kept in the course of its business, including information related to the member firm that was under SEC investigation for Reg. SHO violations. CBOE and C2 agreed to settle the charges without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings. CBOE agreed to pay $6 million, accept a censure and cease-and-desist order, and implement significant undertakings. C2 also agreed to a censure and cease-and-desist order and significant undertakings.

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Investment Adviser Chauncey Mayfield and Others with Stealing Money from the Detroit Police and Firefighters Pension Fund

SEC v. MayfieldGentry Realty Advisors et al., Case No. 2:13-cv-12520 NGE MAR (E.D. Mich.).  On June 10, 2013, the SEC announced it filed a complaint against Chauncey C. Mayfield for taking $3.1 million from the Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit without obtaining permission.  The SEC also charged other MayfieldGentry executives for helping Mayfield to try to cover up the theft.  The other executives are chief financial officer Blair D. Ackman, chief operating officer Marsha Bass, chief investment officer W. Emery Matthew, and chief compliance officer and general counsel Alicia M. Diaz.  According to the SEC, Mayfield took the money from a trust account for the pension fund in 2008.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Whittier Trust and Fund Manager Victor Dosti with Insider Trading

SEC v. Victor Dosti and Whittier Trust Co (S.D.N.Y).  On June 7, 2013, the SEC announced it filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York charging Victor Dosti and Whittier Trust Company with insider trading.  According to the SEC, Whittier Trust and fund manager Dosti were involved in an insider trading scheme involving the securities of Dell, Nvidia Corporation, and Wind River Systems.  The SEC alleges that Dosti used confidential, inside information obtained from employees at Dell and Nvidia to trade in before several quarterly earnings announcements.  Dosti made profits and avoided losses exceeding $475,000 for Whittier Trust.  Dosti also made $247,000 by trading Wind River stock based upon detailed information obtained from an Intel employee from a Whitier Trust fund manager that he supervised.  The SEC charged Whittier Trust and Dosti with violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act.  Without admitting or denying the charges, Whittier Trust and Dosti agreed to settle.  Whittier Trust agreed to pay disgorgement of $724,051.62 plus prejudgment interest of $75,296.00 and a penalty of $724,051.62.  Dosti agreed to pay disgorgement of $77,900.00 plus prejudgment interest of $2,951.43, and a penalty of $77,900.00.  Both also agreed to be permanently enjoined from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

SEC and CFTC Charge Cyprus-Based Banc de Binary with Illegally Selling Binary Options

SEC v. Banc de Binary Ltd., Case No. 2:13-cv-00993 (D. Nev.).  On June 6, 2013, the SEC announced charges against Banc de Binary for unlawfully selling binary options.  Binary options are options contracts where the payout depends on whether the underlying asset increases or decreases in value.  With binary options, there are only two outcomes for an investor – either they get a pre-determined amount of money if the value of the asset increases, or they get no money if the value decreases.  The SEC alleges that Banc de Binary offered and sold binary options without first registering the securities with the SEC.  Through YouTube videos and spam email, Banc de Binary induced investors to purchase binary options whose underlying assets included stock and stock indices.  The SEC also alleges that the company acted as a broker when selling the options, but did not register as a broker with the SEC.  The SEC’s complaint charges the company with violating Section 5 of the Securities Act and Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act.  The SEC is seeking disgorgement, civil monetary penalties, and injunctive relief.

The SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) today issued a joint Investor Alert to warn investors about fraudulent promotional schemes involving binary options and binary options trading platforms which can be found here.  The CFTC also announced the filing of parallel charges against Banc de Binary

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SEC Freezes the Assets of Badin Rungruangnavarat for Insider Trading Before Smithfield Foods Acquisition Announcement

SEC v. Badin Rungruangnavarat, Case No. 13-cv-4172 (N.D. Il.).  On June 6, 2013, the SEC announced it obtained an emergency order freezing the assets of Badin Rungruangnavarat who is in Bangkok, Thailand.  The SEC alleges that Rungruangnavarat bought out-of-the-money Smithfield call options and single-stock futures in an account at a broker-dealer before the public announcement that China-based Shuanghui International Holdings agreed to acquire Smithfield for $4.7 billion.  After the announcement, Smithfield’s stock price soared.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Michael Bartoszek and his Penny Stock Company with Fraud and Insider Trading

SEC v. Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc. and Michael B. Bartoszek, Case No. 13-cv-3887 (S.D.N.Y.).  On June 5, 2013, the SEC announced charges against Laidlaw Energy Group and its CEO Michael B. Bartoszek.  According to the SEC, Bartoszek sold billions of shares of Laidlaw stock at well below the market price.  The SEC alleges that Laidlaw did not register the stock offerings with the SEC and the offerings were not exempt from registration.  Laidlaw made $1.2 million from the stock sales and these funds were the only source of company revenue.  The SEC suspended trading in Laidlaw stock in June 2011. Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment