SEC Charges Solar Company In Market Manipulation Case

SEC Sunrise Solar Corporation, Eddie D. Austin, Jr., and Carolyn Austin, Civil Action No. 5:12-cv-00918-OLG (W.D. Tx.).  On October 1, 2012, the SEC announced it had filed fraud charges against Sunrise Solar Corporation, its former CEO Eddie D. Austin, Jr., and his wife Carolyn Austin for their involvement in a market manipulation scheme.  Austin prepared and disseminated numerous false press releases that portrayed Sunrise as a thriving solar power business.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Subramanian Krishnan With Evading Internal Controls

SEC v. Subramanian Krishnan, Case No.: 12-CV-2495 PAM-JJG (D. Minn.).  On September 28, 2012, the SEC announced it had filed a partially-settled enforcement action against Subramanian Krishnan.  Krishnan was the former CFO of Digi International, Inc. (“Digi”).  Corporate funds were used to pay for unauthorized travel and entertainment expenses.  Krishnan authorized the expenses for Digi employees which caused the Company to file inaccurate reports.  He also did not enforce Digi’s internal controls, failed to reveal inaccurate reports, and wrongly certified that he evaluated the effectiveness of Digi’s internal controls and disclosed they were effective. Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Investment Bank Analyst And Friend With Insider Trading

SEC v. v. Jauyo (“Jason”) Lee and Victor Chen, Case No. C12-5031-JSC (N.D. Cal.).  On September 27, 2012, the SEC announced insider trading charges against Jauyo “Jason” Lee and his friend Victor Chen.  Lee routinely received sensitive information as an investment banker which he passed on to Chen.  For example, Lee tipped Chen about two upcoming corporate takeovers, and Chen traded on that information, leading to more than $600,000 in illegal profits.  Bank records showed a pattern of significant cash withdrawals by Lee followed by large cash deposits by Chen.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Bradley Holcom and Jose Pinedo in $42 Million Fraud Targeting Senior Citizens

SEC v. Bradley A. Holcom, Case No. 3:12-cv-01623 (S.D. Cal.); SEC v. Jose L. Pinedo, Case No. 3:12-cv-01620 (S.D. Cal.).  On September 27, 2012, the SEC announced fraud charges against Bradley Holcom and Jose Pinedo.  Holcom was behind an unregistered offering that sold $42 million worth of promissory notes to investors, many of whom were senior citizens.  He offered investors guaranteed monthly interest payments on safe deals.  He also told investors that their funds would be used to finance the development of specific pieces of real estate, and that each investment would be secured by a first-position trust deed on the underlying property.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Jonathan Bryant, Thomas Kelly, Carl Duncan and 8000, Inc. In Market Manipulation Scam

SEC v. 8000, Inc., Jonathan E. Bryant, Thomas J. Kelly, and Carl N. Duncan, Esq., Case No. 12-CV-7261 (S.D.N.Y.).  On September 27, 2012, the SEC announced charges against 8000, Inc., Jonathan E. Bryant, Thomas J. Kelly, and Carl N. Duncan, Esq. for their roles in a scheme to manipulate 8000, Inc.’s (“EIGH”) stock price.  Bryant got control of EIGH and named Kelly its CEO.  He retained Duncan as the company’s securities lawyer.  The three engineered a plan in which they increased the company’s stock price while selling restricted shares.  Bryan and Kelly publicized financial reports and issued press releases falsely claiming that EIGH had millions of dollars in capital and revenues.  At the same time, Duncan provided the OTC Markets Group, Inc. and EIGH’s transfer agent with false opinion letters representing that EIGH’s common stock was quoted in a market widely available to investors.  As a result of the false opinion letters, Bryant was able to acquire stock certificates without restrictive legends for EIGH’s restricted stock, which allowed him to sell tens of millions of shares that he could not have otherwise sold.  The trading volume in EIGH stock soared and the share price increased dramatically as a result of the manipulation.  Bryant and Kelly earned significant profits from their stock sales.

The SEC charged EIGH with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.  The SEC charged Kelly and Bryant with the same violations and with aiding and abetting EIGH’s violations.  The SEC also charged Bryant with control person liability and with violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.  The SEC seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalties against all defendants, and penny stock bars against Bryant and Kelly.

The SEC settled with Duncan, who without admitting or denying the charges, agreed to a permanent injunction against of violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and from preparing or issuing any opinion letter in connection with the offer or sale of securities pursuant to, or claiming an exemption under, Section 4(1) of the Securities Act and Rules 144 and 802 under the Securities Act, including without limitation, signing an opinion letter or preparing an opinion letter to be signed by another person, related to such offering.  Duncan will receive a penny stock bar, he will disgorge $15,570 in legal fees that he received plus $524.98 in prejudgment interest, and he will pay a $25,000 civil monetary penalty.  In a related 102(e) administrative proceeding, Duncan agreed to be permanently suspended from appearing or practicing before the SEC as an attorney.

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

SEC Settles Pay-to-Play Case Against Goldman Sachs and Neil Morrison for $7 million

In the Matter of Goldman, Sachs & Co., Admin. Proc. No. 3-15048; In the Matter of Neil Morrison, Admin Proc. No. 3-15049.  On September 27, 2012, the SEC announced charges against Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its former investment banker Neil Morrison for “pay-to-play” violations involving undisclosed campaign contributions to then-Massachusetts state treasurer Timothy P. Cahill while he was a candidate for governor.  A pay-to-play scheme is one where campaign contributions or other payments are made in order to influence the awarding of contracts for securities underwriting business. Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SEC Files Fraud Charges Against Bank Executives For Misstating Losses

SEC v. Gilbert G. Lundstrom et al., Case No. 8:12-cv-00343 (D. Neb.); SEC v. Don A. Langford, Case No. 8:12-cv-00344 (D. Neb.).  On September 25, 2012, the SEC announced fraud charges against Gilbert Lundstrom, who was CEO and chairman of the board of TierOne bank; James Laphen, who was the bank’s president and COO; and Don Langford who was the chief credit officer.  Together, the three were involved in TierOne understating its loan-related losses as well as losses on real estate repossessed by the bank.  TierOne started making riskier loans, and so the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) directed the bank to maintain higher capital ratios.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Four Individuals In $1.7 Million Investment Scam

SEC v. Rudolf D. Pameijer, et al., Case No. 1:12-CV-01364 (S.D. In.).  On September 24, 2012, the SEC announced fraud charges against Rudolf D. Pameijer, Lindsay R. Sayer, Ryan W. Koester and his entity Rykoworks Capital Group, LLC.  Koester claimed to be an expert foreign currency trader, and told investors that his trading strategy produced guaranteed results.  Koester and Pameijer agreed share profits for clients Pameijer brought to Rykoworks.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SEC Charges Registered Representative David Rothman Stealing Investor Funds

SEC v. David L. Rothman, Case No. 12-cv-5412-BMS (E.D. Pa.).  On September 24, 2012, the SEC announced fraud charges against David Rothman, a registered representative and minority owner of Rothman Securities, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the SEC.  For several years Rothman provided false account statements to his elderly and unsophisticated investors that overstated the value of their investment accounts.  When some investors discovered that the account statements were false, Rothman tried to cover up his conduct by agreeing to pay those investors the fake investment returns he reported.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tyco International, Ltd. To Pay $26 Million to Settle Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations

SEC v. Tyco, International Ltd., Case No. 1:12-cv-01583 (D.D.C.).  On September 24, 2012, the SEC announced the filing of a settled FCPA case against Tyco.  In 2006, the SEC filed a settled FCPA action against Tyco in which the company agreed to injunctive relief, $1 in disgorgement, and a $50 million civil penalty.  Around the time of the settlement, Tyco agreed to review its FCPA compliance.  The review revealed that there were FCPA violations that occurred after the 2006 injunction.  Among the misconduct uncovered, Tyco subsidiaries were involved in schemes to make unlawful payments by sales agents to government officials in Turkey.  Continue reading

Posted in Securities | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment